Monday, April 11, 2022

Day 41: I'm Okay


What would I say?  If I had a platform and a podium and the undivided attention of those people who really mattered to me.  

"I'm okay."

And I might just leave it at that.  I might chicken out and say nothing else.  I might wonder if my words matter.  I might spare those who matter to me from the hard core stuff that I share so openly on my blogs.  I might look in their eyes and rethink my freedom of speech.  But to tell them, to tell everyone that "I'm okay"; maybe that is all I need to say.  

I guess that is what I would like everyone to understand.  I am not someone that needs fixing.  I'm on a journey.  I am bound to hit bumps in the road.  But I'm okay.  

This journey through Atheism for Lent has been enriching for me.  I have been given a look inside the windows of many a soul and have found more beauty in the empty hearts.  Empty hearts always have room for others.  


Sunday, April 10, 2022

Day 40: Poplar Sunday

 



For fifty some years, I never questioned the sense of Palm Sunday.  I live in Alberta.  We don't have palm trees in this province.  People have to import branches so their kids can wave them in church on Palm Sunday.  I get it... they are bringing the story to life and according to the story, Jesus' donkey walked on palm trees.  But Jesus' donkey made hoof prints in the Middle East where there is probably an abundance of palm trees.  

I am officially christening the Sunday before Easter as Poplar Sunday.  I know there aren't leaves on the trees yet, but in the spirit of recreating a story in this time and space, poplar is what I have to offer.  

I think I have an issue with something more than trees.  I have an issue with a very out of date story and a culture that exists two thousand years later.  Why can't we embrace the world we live in and our amenities and create a story more relevant?  People have only done damage to the ancient story by not understanding the cultural context.  Like flying palm trees in an Edmonton church, they take the ancient stories and fit them to their Canadian evangelical doctrine.  So why not come up with something more culturally significant?  Just a thought.  

I got a call from a former landlady of mine, and she was overjoyed to find a copy of my book in her collection that I published fourteen years ago. Some recent letters that we have exchanged had her concerned about my spiritual wellbeing.  But as she was reading the book, she seems excited that maybe I'm okay.  Did she look at the publication date?  I am a very different person than I was fourteen years ago.  She hopes that I am the same person.  It would make her journey a lot less troubled if she didn't know the whole story.  Maybe the loving thing for me to do is to just let her believe that I haven't changed since she knew me.  

I have no courage to have a phone conversation with her, but I might write her again.  I just don't know if I want to keep up the charade.  We aren't in regular communication, so maybe I can just send her an Easter card. What if I asked her not to ask any questions that she doesn't want the honest answer for.  What if I asked her just to accept her version of the story as true, then I wouldn't have to disappoint her.  

She isn't the only one that I fear disappointing with the real story.  WWLD: What does Love do?  


Saturday, April 9, 2022

Day 39: Mike and Bart Debate


 I am enjoying the debate so far.  Mike Licona started it off.  He had some good things to say, but he is still basing his hypothesis on a 2000 year old story and his trust in the authorship of that story.  

I asked a couple of questions, but they must have been lost in the flood.  So maybe I won't ask anymore.  I will just sit back and learn and listen.  

I think this whole debate will not be able to answer the one question I have today... 

Even if the Resurrection did happen... what is it supposed to mean 2000 years later?  

Oh... got to go.... Bart's up


After listening to Mike and Bart, I am still leery of how Mike is hanging on to real weak evidence.  I wish he would say something about it being okay if you can't prove the Resurrection, but can still have faith in it being helpful for life.  This world is very limited in what it can give people to survive it.  Believing that the Creator of the Cosmos became human isn't a bad story...  it is just old and needs updating, not to mention the bloody narrative that the whole bible embraces.  But if I dare suggest an update, then that is going against everything most hold sacred.  But sacred doesn't mean it happened.  It is just sacred.  

I think I could end now with so much taken away from the discussion.  And yet there is more this afternoon.  I might miss some due to my presence needed to load heaters, but this discussion is not lost.   It will be recorded and I will have access to it for later viewing.  

I am still going to say that I am 2000 years past the story and that is a long time to hang on to something that is life changing for me now.  I don't think I am able to envision a Creator that is going to be limited to a revelation from 30 CE and expect it to hold through millennia without getting twisted, marred and seriously out of date.  I look at the stars, the animals, the trees... I feel the wind and the snow on my face.  This is evidence for me that there is something beyond myself wanting to connect with me.  That is a Creator that moves with the changes in time and space.  That makes a lot more sense to me.  Maybe I can gain something from the story, but it will never be enough anymore.  Like I said to my mother... I need something in my lifetime that I can connect with.         

Okay... On to the afternoon.  

I don't think I was ever bored during the hours of interchange between Bart and Mike.  Both are incredible communicators.  That is something greatly lacking in a lot of the speakers that make their way to Youtube these days. 

My favourite part of the whole day was Bart's closing bit, because he explained why he does debates.  He does it to include those who get excluded by Evangelical Christianity.  He made a point to say that he doesn't mind if people embrace religion until it gets harmful.  He strongly emphasized that Evangelical Christianity really flowed in the direction being divisive. As much as Mike is a nice person, it is the message he supports.  That part was sad, but over all, the last five minutes was beautiful.  

I want to end this post off with a quote I found as a reply to a post from someone on Facebook.  I don't know if I agree or disagree, I just like the quote. 

"Faith is nothing more than substituting knowledge with emotions" Lloyd Moore


Friday, April 8, 2022

Day 38: Questions to ask Bart and Mike tomorrow


 Tomorrow is the "debate to end all debates" according to Bart Ehrman and Mike Licona.  I don't know what kind of head I have going into tomorrow's event, but I need to ask some questions.  So this is what I want to understand.  

We are 2000 years past the story.  How much confidence do you have that the story as written was authentic, and not creative writing?  

Is the Resurrection all that makes Jesus matter? Was his life worth nothing if the Resurrection can't be proved? 

I have no faith in the Bible as 100% historically accurate... Is there any other evidence to help support the Resurrection?

If the Resurrection can't be proved, does that mean that 2.3 Billion people can't have faith in it?  What is faith, if certainty is required in the event of the Resurrection?

You are asking that we pick sides, but our identity has already landed us on a side (Christian vs Not Christian) .  Can we really be impartial in a debate like this?

What percentage of that 2.3 Billion believe in a Resurrection because they don't want to burn in hell? (ie fire insurance)... It seems that most have been convinced to believe, not on evidence or proof, but because the alternative is ugly. 

Is Christianity based on historical facts or theological truths? 

How much of Christianity is about Jesus life, and how much is about his death and resurrection.  If you can't embrace the latter (resurrection) , does the former still hold value for life? 

It seems like the only way to believe in the Resurrection is to believe in an infallible, inerrant bible.  Is this the case?

So many questions, and I doubt I want to plug up tomorrow's chat box with all of them.  But I do want to aim a few in Mike's direction.  I think I can pretty much agree with Bart's conclusions that the Resurrection is about faith, not evidence or historical fact. But maybe for Mike, faith isn't enough... so it has to be proven and believed to be historical.  That is a stretch for me now.  I will write more tomorrow about what I learned.  



Thursday, April 7, 2022

Day 37: God is on the Bathroom Floor (by Nightbirde)




I don’t remember most of Autumn, because I lost my mind late in the summer and for a long time after that, I wasn’t in my body. I was a lightbulb buzzing somewhere far.

After the doctor told me I was dying, and after the man I married said he didn’t love me anymore, I chased a miracle in California and sixteen weeks later, I got it. The cancer was gone. But when my brain caught up with it all, something broke. I later found out that all the tragedy at once had caused a physical head trauma, and my brain was sending false signals of excruciating pain and panic.

I spent three months propped against the wall. On nights that I could not sleep, I laid in the tub like an insect, staring at my reflection in the shower knob. I vomited until I was hollow. I rolled up under my robe on the tile. The bathroom floor became my place to hide, where I could scream and be ugly; where I could sob and spit and eventually doze off, happy to be asleep, even with my head on the toilet.

I have had cancer three times now, and I have barely passed thirty. There are times when I wonder what I must have done to deserve such a story. I fear sometimes that when I die and meet with God, that He will say I disappointed Him, or offended Him, or failed Him. Maybe He’ll say I just never learned the lesson, or that I wasn’t grateful enough. But one thing I know for sure is this: He can never say that He did not know me. 

I am God’s downstairs neighbor, banging on the ceiling with a broomstick. I show up at His door every day. Sometimes with songs, sometimes with curses. Sometimes apologies, gifts, questions, demands. Sometimes I use my key under the mat to let myself in. Other times, I sulk outside until He opens the door to me Himself. 

I have called Him a cheat and a liar, and I meant it. I have told Him I wanted to die, and I meant it. Tears have become the only prayer I know. Prayers roll over my nostrils and drip down my forearms. They fall to the ground as I reach for Him. These are the prayers I repeat night and day; sunrise, sunset.

Call me bitter if you want to—that’s fair. Count me among the angry, the cynical, the offended, the hardened. But count me also among the friends of God. For I have seen Him in rare form. I have felt His exhale, laid in His shadow, squinted to read the message He wrote for me in the grout: “I’m sad too.” 

If an explanation would help, He would write me one—I know it. But maybe an explanation would only start an argument between us—and I don’t want to argue with God. I want to lay in a hammock with Him and trace the veins in His arms.

I remind myself that I’m praying to the God who let the Israelites stay lost for decades. They begged to arrive in the Promised Land, but instead He let them wander, answering prayers they didn’t pray. For forty years, their shoes didn’t wear out. Fire lit their path each night. Every morning, He sent them mercy-bread from heaven. 

I look hard for the answers to the prayers that I didn’t pray. I look for the mercy-bread that He promised to bake fresh for me each morning. The Israelites called it manna, which means “what is it?” 

That’s the same question I’m asking—again, and again. There’s mercy here somewhere—but what is it? What is it? What is it?

I see mercy in the dusty sunlight that outlines the trees, in my mother’s crooked hands, in the blanket my friend left for me, in the harmony of the wind chimes. It’s not the mercy that I asked for, but it is mercy nonetheless. And I learn a new prayer: thank you. It’s a prayer I don’t mean yet, but will repeat until I do.

Call me cursed, call me lost, call me scorned. But that’s not all. Call me chosen, blessed, sought-after. Call me the one who God whispers his secrets to. I am the one whose belly is filled with loaves of mercy that were hidden for me.

Even on days when I’m not so sick, sometimes I go lay on the mat in the afternoon light to listen for Him. I know it sounds crazy, and I can’t really explain it, but God is in there—even now. I have heard it said that some people can’t see God because they won’t look low enough, and it’s true. 

If you can’t see him, look lower. God is on the bathroom floor." (NIGHTBIRDE MARCH 9, 2021)


"GOD IS ON THE BATHROOM FLOOR" 

There is a poetry to that and I don't have much else to say but how much that moves me.  I can even forget that in Nightbirde's eyes, God is still a dude.  But maybe when she gets to the last line, there is not a dude that is there laying beside her... but the Breath that dwells in her and moves in and out and back in her again.  

If God is that which man has created to explain life, then maybe there is a hope that God can be seen, even as low as the bathroom floor.  But if that which gave her breath, breathes in her and through her... then that very breath exhausts itself on the bathroom tiles and waits to be taken in again.  In, Out... that is how breath works.  Not something high above looking over her, but in and out as she labours to breathe.  Not only that which gives her breath... but Breath itself.  


Wednesday, April 6, 2022

Day 36: What is Truth?

 


John 18:28a is my new favourite bible verse.  Three words that sum up my thoughts on truth. 

Pilate said it better than anyone... and even Jesus didn't have a reply for him, or maybe Pilate didn't let Jesus respond.  He just walked out on the conversation with that question hanging over both of them.  

"What is Truth?"  

When someone identifies a thought or an idea as truth, they have made up their mind and I have no place to even discuss it with them.  Nothing I say will matter at that point.  

If someone has a thought or idea that they have and they identify it as an opinion, there is room for conversation.  They may be open to an alternate perspective if it is only opinion.  

"I find this interesting... what do you think?"  is a much more open approach to discussing a subject. 

I tread lightly on the claim of truth now.  I am not being a coward;  I am just putting my relationships ahead of my own need to be right.  I am letting Love override Truth.  What is Truth without Love?  And then when Love is there, is there a need for claiming what I have is Truth?  What if Love is enough.  Love and my opinion if I need to say anything.  Everything else seems arrogant to me.  

If there is any chance that someone can disagree with me, then to claim that I have the truth, is being disrespectful of their humanity.  I don't want to do that.  

This blog post... is my thought, my idea, my opinion.  I'm not even going to say that this is the truth.  

Tuesday, April 5, 2022

Day 35: The Meaning of Mystery



Two Chapters from Jean Messlier's Book "Superstition of all Ages" 

CXI.—ABSURDITY AND INUTILITY OF THE MYSTERIES FORGED IN THE SOLE INTEREST OF THE PRIESTS.

What is a mystery? If I examine the thing closely, I discover very soon that a mystery is nothing but a contradiction, a palpable absurdity, a notorious impossibility, on which theologians wish to compel men to humbly close the eyes; in a word, a mystery is whatever our spiritual guides can not explain to us.

It is advantageous for the ministers of religion that the people should not comprehend what they are taught. It is impossible for us to examine what we do not comprehend. Every time that we can not see clearly, we are obliged to be guided. If religion was comprehensible, priests would not have so many charges here below.

No religion is without mysteries; mystery is its essence; a religion destitute of mysteries would be a contradiction of terms. The God which serves as a foundation to natural religion, to theism or to deism, is Himself the greatest mystery to a mind wishing to dwell upon Him.

CXII.—CONTINUATION.

All the revealed religions which we see in the world are filled with mysterious dogmas, unintelligible principles, of incredible miracles, of astonishing tales which seem imagined but to confound reason. Every religion announces a concealed God, whose essence is a mystery; consequently, it is just as difficult to conceive of His conduct as of the essence of this God Himself. Divinity has never spoken to us but in an enigmatical and mysterious way in the various religions which have been founded in the different regions of our globe. It has revealed itself everywhere but to announce mysteries, that is to say, to warn mortals that it designs that they should believe in contradictions, in impossibilities, or in things of which they were incapable of forming any positive idea.

The more mysteries a religion has, the more incredible objects it presents to the mind, the better fitted it is to please the imagination of men, who find in it a continual pasturage to feed upon. The more obscure a religion is, the more it appears divine, that is to say, in conformity to the nature of an invisible being, of whom we have no idea.

It is the peculiarity of ignorance to prefer the unknown, the concealed, the fabulous, the wonderful, the incredible, even the terrible, to that which is clear, simple, and true. Truth does not give to the imagination such lively play as fiction, which each one may arrange as he pleases. The vulgar ask nothing better than to listen to fables; priests and legislators, by inventing religions and forging mysteries from them, have served them to their taste. In this way they have attracted enthusiasts, women, and the illiterate generally. Beings of this kind resign easily to reasons which they are incapable of examining; the love of the simple and the true is found but in the small number of those whose imagination is regulated by study and by reflection. The inhabitants of a village are never more pleased with their pastor than when he mixes a good deal of Latin in his sermon. Ignorant men always imagine that he who speaks to them of things which they do not understand, is a very wise and learned man. This is the true principle of the credulity of nations, and of the authority of those who pretend to guide them.


Mystery... Jean Messlier seems to condemn the idea of mystery as a cover-up of truth.  Maybe a cop out for religion when they can't explain the unexplainable.  

These two excerpts captured my attention this morning.  Do we need cover-ups and cop outs?  Do we need to hide behind ideas like mystery just to save face with people who understand a little less than us.  After all it is those people who are coming to us for answers.  We start that quest when we are children.  The hunt for answers doesn't find its end until we get much older and discover that the answers continue to elude us no matter how hard we look for them.  

Maybe some where along the journey, we have become frustrated with the elusive answers, and we have settled on explanations of the unknown instead.  We only see the unknown or unknowable or the unknowing... and it isn't satisfying us, so we use mystery as an answer and a conclusion.  But maybe there was never meant to be an answer or a conclusion.  

When will we, as a species, be content with the unknown.  That seems to be the way out of our hunt and quest that doesn't provide us with what we need?  

I almost quite reading Jean Messlier... but today, I am thinking he has more to teach me.  So I will read on.